Energy Benchmarking in U.S. Office Buildings Overview The benchmarking spreadsheets provided allow you to identify where your specific office building ranks relative to others. They calculate the energy use intensity (EUI) of your building, provide the typical (median) EUI for office buildings with the same characteristics as yours, and identify where your building's performance ranks compared to others. They go beyond the customary normalization by floor area and account for performance differences due to variations in worker density, the number of personal computers, operating hours, occupancy type, and heating fuel types. Beyond floor area, these characteristics were found to be the most common and most important drivers of electric and non-electric energy use in US office buildings. Climate impacts on energy use were less significant, in part because analyses were conducted within regional census divisions. Background There is an important difference in this approach in comparison to other benchmarking approaches. Your building is compared to others that have the same characteristics you provide as input. Thus, you are not comparing your building, which may have a high worker density (an important driver of energy use in 7 of 9 census divisions), to others with medium or low worker densities. Other important drivers of energy use are also accounted for. Wide variances in these drivers can strongly impact the energy use in office buildings. By accounting for these, we avoid comparing office buildings that have sound reasons for higher energy use to those that do not. Using this approach, we improve our ability to compare buildings leading to better identification of problem buildings and more reliable targets for our efficiency and cost reduction efforts. Development Basis The EUI distributions used in these spreadsheets were developed based upon statistical analysis of approximately 1500 office buildings in the US Energy Information Administration's 1992 CBECS database. These were divided into their corresponding nine US census divisions for analysis. Thus, different areas of the US could have different results depending on what characteristics were found most important to the locale. A subset of over 70 building characteristics from the CBECS database were selected and examined for their relationship to office building energy use. These were refined down to four characteristics that were the most important determinants of electricity use and the four most important for non-electric energy use. These few characteristics explained most of the variations in energy use that could be explained by considering all characteristics that had statistically significant relationships to energy use. Thus, addressing additional characteristics provided limited value. Within census divisions, climate was not a major driver of either electric or non-electric energy use. Feedback on your experience using these spreadsheets is requested. Please direct comments to Terry Sharp, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Building 3147, PO Box 6070, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6070; e-mail: sharptr@ornl.gov; telephone: (865) 574-3559.